level 0

for some people it is obviousl that if an

organsiation is only governed to take as much from

everyone every quarter then that is not a sustanable 

maths -if obvious go to level 1

for other people we need to agree some langauge- do

you agree that a valuable organsitions makes connections

or exchnages between multiple sources such as owners and customers and societies:

as soon as we have connections between 3 or more sources which strenghten or

weaken each component source we have a system - and while a system is alive

these are charcteristics agreed among mathematicians of systems:

the overall system will be spiralling through time - either postively growing the whole

or negatively ie towards collapse (eventially death of a system)

the metric for spirals is expoential

another orinciples of systems is that while you may wish to govern them at one level

it is wise to assume that they may have more micro exchnages ninsdie then which integrate

to deliver the model you are looking at (as indeed there may be more macro levels) 

 level 1 when we audit a system what we should

want to know is not a number but where is it heading on

an expoentrla up eg syrong growth or an expoenetial down eg mulplying risks of sollapse

there is one very important things to rfemember about arithemetic:

multiply is the operand you use when sources ineteract growth- whereas addition is an operand when things are separate 

so is it obvious that for auditiong a system of living connectiosn we need to use ,ultplication not addition

as a simple example we know of 100 of compamies who were told their profits could go up at some additional risk to society which if it occurred was cause a fine but less than the proits- in an additve model you do that especially as in amrica there are lawyers who chase a board if they dont do that

however our model looks at trust as being multiplcative so while trust may have gone up if all teh shareholder sees is the profits the distrust of society that can see the increased risk goes down- if you reduce trust to zero however much your profit weet up a multipoluer of zeros is zero- one of the five biggest global auditors around 2000 called andersen was zeroised by the peopels because its ausdit serillay caused organsiations to pass riks or lies onto society 

level 2 this is roughly speaking what audirots and people who govern a system need to want information on - are we trasvelling up a rising exponetial or down a colapsing one- which of our diferent sources trust-flows are rising or declining- what is the winw-in or win-lose between different relationshiop connections- what has caised chnage since the last time we looked at this audit